Parataxis

In the beginning there was not darkness,
no shadow cast by monuments of men,
though Tyndale's Vulgate, imperial and opulent,
was already in the mind.
But soon enough there was no twist, iamb or trochee
that could escape it, and all subordination
(Did Thomas H. know?  Did Thomas M.?)
transformed into parallel clauses.
And this is how the story went,
founders and builders with their mind turned by it,
Cooper, long after Turner's truth spread west,
told the story of king, ruddy and majestic,
fresh from the fields where they stood signifier for themselves.
And let us not forget thorny Nate,
Puritanical,
the whale-man dedicated that book to him,
through which one might depopulate the sea,
wrestle with Leviathan,
and undo what was done in the beginning.
And yet he used the words
which cannot belong to him.
And Hemingway must have known
that his 'ands' had antecedents,
his narrative of subsequent but parallel clauses
was not created from nothing.
And we still see it today, the long shadow of the king.
Is the only one who we have left,
Crevecoeur the Ophiolater
(a British man found that out)
because he heard it second hand?
If only we read and read and read
and knew for sure.